|
![]() |
||||
|
CENTER SECTION: CATHOLICS WITH DISABILITIES "What's wrong with you?" the topic of conversation at snack time during my first grade CCD class had quickly turned to me, and the “interrogation” had only just begun. "Why do you walk funny?” “Why do you have to wear those things on your legs?” “Why did God make you that way?" My classmates' questions both surprised and confused me. I remember it as though it were yesterday. I remember just as clearly that I had no idea how to answer them. An Awakening As I grew older I started thinking about disability a lot more—usually when architectural barriers prevented me from participating in some activity or another with my friends, or happily, when children would approach me intent on understanding or interacting. I thought about it most often, though, when someone would tell me how sorry they were that such a tragedy had befallen me, or conversely, how special, inspiring, and blessed I was by God to “carry such a heavy cross.” I knew, for the most part, that people meant no harm or disrespect in their comments and questions, but their words could wound and sting just the same. The Largest Minority My experience is not unique among persons with disabilities, especially those who were born with "functional limitations" or acquired them early in life. Any pain or difficulties I experienced seemed a part of life, not a “problem” of disability. I was “okay” with my disability. It seemed no less a part of who I was than my “Irish-ness,” my “girl-ness,” my “Catholic-ness.” The only “burden” I felt it caused came when I struggled to understand the reasons for my sometimes inaccessible surroundings or the often negative and hurtful attitudes that many felt so compelled to share with me. A Partial “Victory” The church has also made important strides in becoming a more accessible and welcoming community, most notably with the release of the 1978 Pastoral Statement of U.S. Catholic Bishops on Persons with Disabilities and the establishment of the National Catholic Partnership on Disability (NCPD), but it lags far behind civil society in the success of its efforts. To be sure, the consequence of significant financial penalties for noncompliance greatly influenced the success of civil efforts to eliminate discriminatory practices. Churches and religious organizations were "freed” from the fear and pressure of these penalties due to their exemption from compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in these circumstances. Legitimate financial constraints have also had an impact on the church's opportunities to become more architecturally accessible. Still, when our supermarkets, subways, and shopping malls are more welcoming and accessible than our faith communities, it should give us pause. Access and inclusion belong to the very essence of things: they are constitutive to the very mission of the church. An accessible and welcoming church is not about the ADA. It is about the gospel. What is it, then, that keeps us from finding solutions to the costly remedies of design and construction barriers? Why haven’t we made it a priority? Why are we content to “not have any persons with disabilities in our parishes" even when there are no architectural barriers? What is it that continues to thwart our goals for equal access and meaningful participation for all?
Attitude Adjustments Disability is now more often understood as a normal and expected part of living that should be planned for. The National Catholic Partnership on Disability (NCPD) offers the following definition: “Disabilities are the normal, anticipated outcomes of the risks, stresses, and strains of the living process.” Insights from others, like the World Health Organization, define disability as a contextual variable, dynamic over time and in relation to circumstances. One is more or less disabled based on the interaction between the person and his or her individual, institutional and social environments. In any case, these definitions move away from beliefs that will encourage negative attitudes and stereotypes about disability resulting in exclusion, marginalization, and segregation. This is the key to dismantling the harmful, even dangerous, disabling philosophies and theologies of the past. It is the seed “fallen on rich soil, and producing fruit a hundred or sixty or thirty fold.” When someone with a disability leaves the church because of harmful and destructive attitudes toward disability, it is a tragedy and a loss for the entire community. The tragedy is compounded when whole families depart because of these barriers to welcoming and participation. Persons with disabilities do not live in a vacuum, and the hurt experienced in these moments can be lasting and felt by the entire family. In their pastoral statement, the U.S. bishops remind us that “there can be no separate church for persons with disabilities. We are one flock…” (p.33 ). The powerful and profound demonstration of this truth is found in the structure-shaking attitudes and behavior of Jesus Christ throughout the four gospels. Even a cursory reading of the New Testament will reveal a prominent place of persons with disabilities in the life and ministry of Jesus and his deep care and concern for them. When we re-examine the radically inclusive nature of his ministry, we find a “new” way of looking at disability that has enormous consequences for every aspect of life. It means the difference between the full participation of persons with disabilities in all aspects of society and the world and the perpetualization of inaccessibility and exclusion. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|